[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf TIme to close the WG - we have completed our work.

To: snmpconf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: snmpconf TIme to close the WG - we have completed our work.
From: Robert Story <rstory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:29:32 -0500
Cc: bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15506AD75C7@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15506AD75C7@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Reply-To: snmpconf@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-snmpconf@xxxxxxxx

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:38:14 +0100 Wijnen, wrote:
WB> Further discussion/questioning can always take place at
WB>    ietfmib@ops.ietf.org

That should be ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org.

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.

References:
- snmpconf TIme to close the WG - we have completed our work.
  - From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)

Prev by Date: Re: snmpconf Re: TIme to close the WG - we have completed our work.
Next by Date: WG Action: Conclusion of Configuration Management with SNMP (snmpconf)
Prev by thread: Re: snmpconf Re: TIme to close the WG - we have completed our work.
Next by thread: snmpconf RFC 4011 on Policy Based Management MIB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread