[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf taxonomy discussion(s) - suggested resolution



Cehck the archives.
/jon
> HI,
> 
> Jon - would you like to try again with content this time FROM THE
> WG discussion. I'm not asking for YOUR OPINION (you have already
> voiced it). I was asking for a summary of the WG opinion, which
> is the ONLY THING that matters.
> 
> At 03:01 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, Jon Saperia wrote:
> >> HI,
> >> 
> >> Jon - would you summarize the pros and cons for BCP categorization.
> >
> >I think I have. The document falls within the guidelines suggested by  2026. 
> >Can you make a compelling case why the document should not be a BCP?
> >/jon
> >> 
> >> At 01:42 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >> >David, the working group had a discussion of whether to call this a BCP. in 
> >> >March. At that time we did not find a compelling reason to change it. Unless 
> >> >you can find some compelling reason that convinces the working group to the 
> >> >contrary we will issue it for last call as a BCP.
> >> >...
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >/jon
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> /david t. perkins
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >Thanks,
> >/jon
> 
> Regards,
> /david t. perkins
> 
> 

Thanks,
/jon
--

Jon Saperia		     saperia@jdscons.com
			     Phone: 617-744-1079
			     Fax:   617-249-0874
			     http://www.jdscons.com/