[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf taxonomy discussion(s) - suggested resolution



HI,

Jon - would you like to try again with content this time FROM THE
WG discussion. I'm not asking for YOUR OPINION (you have already
voiced it). I was asking for a summary of the WG opinion, which
is the ONLY THING that matters.

At 03:01 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, Jon Saperia wrote:
>> HI,
>> 
>> Jon - would you summarize the pros and cons for BCP categorization.
>
>I think I have. The document falls within the guidelines suggested by  2026. 
>Can you make a compelling case why the document should not be a BCP?
>/jon
>> 
>> At 01:42 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>> >David, the working group had a discussion of whether to call this a BCP. in 
>> >March. At that time we did not find a compelling reason to change it. Unless 
>> >you can find some compelling reason that convinces the working group to the 
>> >contrary we will issue it for last call as a BCP.
>> >...
>> >Thanks,
>> >/jon
>> 
>> Regards,
>> /david t. perkins
>> 
>> 
>
>Thanks,
>/jon

Regards,
/david t. perkins