[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf PM MIB Issue #9

Good, this seems best for now. I will mark this closed on our WEB page when it 
appears in the next draft.
> Steve Waldbusser wrote:
> > My main question is, given that there's no way for Juergen's proposal to
> > be standardized before the PM MIB, how do we proceed now? We could:
> > 
> > 1) Do nothing and wait for the storage-type MIB to clarify the PM MIB in
> > the same way as it will clarify all other existing use of storageType.
> > (This doesn't add any dependence on the completion of the storage type
> > MIB).
> > 2) Add a scalar to the PM MIB that writes all nonVolatile entries
> The opinions expressed on this topic clearly support #1 as the course of
> action. Accordingly, I will treat #9 as complete.
> Steve


Jon Saperia		     saperia@jdscons.com
			     Phone: 617-744-1079
			     Fax:   617-249-0874