[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf PM MIB Issue #9

Steve Waldbusser wrote:

> My main question is, given that there's no way for Juergen's proposal to
> be standardized before the PM MIB, how do we proceed now? We could:
> 1) Do nothing and wait for the storage-type MIB to clarify the PM MIB in
> the same way as it will clarify all other existing use of storageType.
> (This doesn't add any dependence on the completion of the storage type
> MIB).
> 2) Add a scalar to the PM MIB that writes all nonVolatile entries

The opinions expressed on this topic clearly support #1 as the course of
action. Accordingly, I will treat #9 as complete.