[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snmpconf pm issue #23 - policy termination
Sounds good to me.
--On Monday, June 04, 2001 9:18 AM -0700 Steve Waldbusser
> Issue: Jon writes: "There have been extensive discussions about
> what to happen when a policy terminates. My recollection -
> with help from David - is that if one wants a policy reset
> after termination, a lower precedence policy should be in
> the group that will take over. I have no issue with this as
> the resolution, only that we need to document that this is
> how this behavior is achieved."
> How's this text?
> "Note that if it is necessary to take certain actions after a policy is
> no longer active on an element, these actions should be included in a
> lower-precedence policy that is in the same policy group."