[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf issue #1 resolution - language versioning




I agree.

Steve

David Partain wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I'll send this out right before I leave for the weekend, so you
> have all weekend to blast me :-)
> 
> This is my take on the results of all of the mail on language
> versioning.  You'll find this thread archived at
> http://www.snmp.com/snmpconf/mailing-list/msg00657.html
> 
> We have previously agreed that new versions of the language
> will be registered as capabilities in the capabilities table.
> The question has largely revolved around whether to register
> the first version in addition.  I do not see a clear consensus
> that this should be done and propose that we not include
> registration of the first version.
> 
> One comment worth noting is that we are not talking about
> changes to accessor functions; we are talking about base
> language changes.  Accessor functions are registered separately.
> As such changes to accessor functions are already addressed.
> 
> So, I think that #1 should be closed with "no change".
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> --
> David Partain                  David.Partain@ericsson.com
> Ericsson Radio Systems AB      Tel:    +46 13 28 41 44
> Research and Innovation        Fax:    +46 13 28 75 67
> P.O. Box 1248
> SE-581 12  Linköping, Sweden