[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: snmpconf BCP - Issue # 2 - Correct any remaining technical errors (fwd)



> At 06:55 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Matt White wrote:
> >--On Friday, May 11, 2001 11:23 AM -0400 Jon Saperia <saperia@jdscons.com> wrote:
> >>>           Agent/X considerations
> >>>Not sure what this would be since AgentX is designed to be invisible to management stations.
> 
> I agree but often times, reality bites.
> 
> I think I recall the flollowing example Shawn A. Routhier told me:
> If a single table spans a few subagents, creating an ifNumber-like
> object might be tricky to get right for a given implementation. 
> 
> In any case, I would propose any agentX specifics
> end up in a specific document on agentX / distributed agent
> implementation experience.
> 
> Regards,
> Mike
> 
Yup, I also agree that the right thing to do is leave it out of the BCP.

Thanks,
/jon
--

Jon Saperia		     saperia@jdscons.com
			     Phone: 617-744-1079
			     Fax:   617-249-0874
			     http://www.jdscons.com/