[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snmpconf #4: Code reuse
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2001 17:19:18 -0400, "Joel M. Halpern" <email@example.com> said:
Joel> My reason for leaning towards leaving them out is that while
Joel> functions (code reuse) are nice to have, they are not strictly
Joel> necessary. And this proposal is already sufficiently large and
Joel> complicated that the magnitude may deter people from adoption.
Joel> I believe that most (maybe even all) the current features are
Joel> there for good reasons. But that does not mean we should not be
Joel> very cautious about adding more.
Thanks for spelling that out for me.
Now, if only we could reach a consenus... Current count is 2-1 in
favor of adding something to support reuse. That's not very