[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snmpconf BCP Section 3.1
Wayne, hope you are better.
With regard to the proposed reorganization, I have two comments:
1. The work on the document is not required to be complete by
April 6. Our goal is to have the to do items enumerated by April
6. I expect it may take another week or so for the BCP. The other
documents may take more time because of other issues.
2. I can see how so many items seems like a flat
hierarchy. Perhaps you can proposed a reorganization using the
current numbers and mapping to a new organization, then we would
be able to see if it is worthwhile.
> Sorry I'm getting in on this late, but I got whacked a bit with illness and
> work mania when I got back from Mpls.
> I'd mentioned this to Jon and Mike at the WG meeting, but one of the
> comments I received from two folks at the meeting was that the section on
> considerations for MIB design was a bit lengthy with no hierarchy to
> it--that is, it runs a flat 3.1.1 section to a 3.1.23, with no real
> organization for any of those sections or their content.
> I made an attempt at this in the -03 draft, and the work that we did on the
> -04 draft just never lent itself to reintroducing this. If anybody else
> feels like this is a worthwhile effort, I could try (with Mike) giving this
> some hierarchy (e.g., 18.104.22.168...3.1.1.n, 22.214.171.124...). I know we have a 6
> Apr. deadline, but I could put some effort into this tomorrow (Monday) if
Jon Saperia email@example.com