[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
snmpconf Re: ... Setcli accessor function ...
Just a reminder: IETF is an organization of individual contributors,
not and organization of companies (or any other organizations).
Therefore the position of any company has no standing here.
Technical reasons from any interested person have standing, and are valued.
At 10:36 AM 01/24/2001 -0800, Mike MacFaden wrote:
>Riverstone Network's position:
>1) We do not need a "setcli()"
>2) We favor an explicit definition in the document as to how vendor
>extensions, if any, can be added in a way that does not interfere
>with how this mechanism is meant to operate.