[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snmpconf 11. Setcli accessor function - Item to be resolved o n email list
Riverstone Network's position:
1) We do not need a "setcli()"
2) We favor an explicit definition in the document as to how vendor extensions, if any,
can be added in a way that does not interfere with how this mechanism is
meant to operate.
At 09:11 AM 1/24/01 -0500, Jon Saperia wrote:
>Since, I started this thread to get consensus, we have had a number of
>messages. I will catch up on them and see if I can form a consensus statement.
>I suggest we close discussion on this point by tomorrow so we can move on to
>the other items on the list. Soo... if you have anything to add that you
>have not already, please do so by close of business tomorrow.