[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: snmpconf Issues for Interim Meeting
I raised during the meeting the question of the interaction with multiple
managers. The answer was that the WG sees as a goal allowing such an
interaction (which is different from the COPS single server paradigm). Later
in the discussions, the proposal of a policy owner concept as a possible
solution to this problem as brought up, though we did not engage in too many
I would suggest that we include this issue in the agenda items for the
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Saperia [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thu April 06 2000 15:42
> To: snmpconf
> Subject: snmpconf Issues for Interim Meeting
> For those of you that were at our meetings in Adelaide or have read the
> draft notes I posted to this list, you will know that we have a number of
> issues to discuss.
> As only an example, a question was raised about the effect of the addition
> of an element to a managed system that had an entry in our Policy Module.
> Specifically, did that new element get configured with the default
> information? There are a number of reasonable views on this topic.
> If anyone has items that can be concisely stated that will help us in our
> work and would like to suggest them as agenda items for the meeting next
> month, please feel free to post them to this list and I will collect them
> together to help refine an agenda.