[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about IPv6 Management

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

      Take a look at the following:



EricLKlein wrote:
> Thank you. I have been reading:
> RFC 2452 IP v6 MIB for the TCP
> RFC 2454 IP v6 MIB for the UDP
> RFC 2466 MIB for IP v6 ICMP 
> But didn't see anything more detailed. Thanks for the information.
> Eric
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) 
>   To: EricLKlein ; v6ops@ops.ietf.org ; eos@ops.ietf.org ; ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com 
>   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:48 AM
>   Subject: RE: Question about IPv6 Management
>   We have been defining a number of things so that IP (or better Internet) addresses
>   can be represented in an IPversion neutral matter. See for example RFC3291.
>   We are checking all MIB modules to be IPv4 and IPv6 capable (unless a module
>   is for one specific IP version). 
>   We have defined TCs so that we also have IPv6 transport addresses so that 
>   SNMP can go over IPv6. See RFC3419
>   Various MIB modules are being reqorked in the IPv6 WG 
>   Hope this helps
>   Thanks,Bert 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: EricLKlein [mailto:ericlklein@softhome.net]
>     Sent: zondag 16 maart 2003 11:19
>     To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org; eos@ops.ietf.org; ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
>     Subject: Question about IPv6 Management
>     I appologize, this is being possted to multiple WG's as it seems to cross areas.
>     Is there any information about the requirment changes in the Network Management Systems (NMS) or Operations Support Systems (OSS) necesary to support IPv6?
>     I have looked at the various MIB RFC's and such, but can not find anything more than you need bigger address support and some SNMPv2 compliance.
>     This seems too simple to me.
>      Eric