[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Recommendation on the path forward for EOS



Title: RE: Recommendation on the path forward for EOS

My expectation is that these changes are best accommodated with a change to the version, however, WG discussion may decide otherwise.

Cheers, /gww

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Shield [mailto:D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:31
> To: Waters, Glenn [CAR:IO47:EXCH]
> Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Recommendation on the path forward for EOS
>
>
> > My recommendation is that the WG focus its efforts on the OOPS draft
> using
> > ideas from Dave Shield's and Dave Perkins' work as appropriate. I
> propose
> > that the WG develops the OOPS work as a standards track effort.
>
> One question:
>
>   Is it intended that this would be a new PDU within the existing
> SNMPv3/v3MP
> framework, or would we be expecting to define a new version at some level
> (either SNMPv4 or SNMPv3/v4MP) ?
>
>   I thought I'd asked this last week, but the message doesn't seem to have
> made
> it to the list.  Wes (in a reply that also got lost?) seems to be thinking
> in
> terms of adding the OOPS PDUs to the existing SNMPv3/3MP - I'd like to
> check
> whether this is the general feeling, or whether the consensus would be for
> new
> PDUs to mean a new version.
>
>
> Dave