[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Protocol operations proposal deadline



Title: RE: Protocol operations proposal deadline

I agree with you Jeurgen. Writing the encoding/decoding code is trivial compared to the work required to implement the semantics.

/gww

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:29
> To: D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk
> Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Protocol operations proposal deadline
>
>
> >>>>> Dave Shield writes:
>
> Dave> Well, that was certainly my experience when actually coding
> Dave> this.  I didn't need to write new parsing routines to handle a
> Dave> new format, and adding in a bit of option extraction/insertion
> Dave> code *was* easier than writing message/PDU parsing routines
> Dave> would have been.
>
> In the code I am familiar with, parsing a new PDU boils down to a
> sequence of calls to the BER encoder/decoder library and filling out a
> data structure. This is in my experience trivial compared to the
> amount of work needed to implement the semantics.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-
> osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>
>
>