[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Draft EOS minutes
Title: Draft EOS minutes
to be sure. I my comments were basically meant to say:
WG seem very inactive. Many todo items keep on the todo list
and not much (if anything) happens on the mailing list.
If that continues, then such work items that get no follow up and
get no discussion on the list will be removed from the
WG (when looking at protocol operations) can try to define
work items that would be complimentary to the SMIng work. It
mean some changes/clarifications to the WG charter, and I am
willing to entertain the justification discussion and then defend
in the IESG
WG should not try to address the "bigger picture" in the
of the operator comments on "what to do for config
"what to do with the xmlConfig discussions" and such.
ADs want to see proper operator rquirements in this space, and
needed, another WG may be formed. But the EOS WG is not
revolutionize NM. That would be a separate effort.
the WG to continue to exist, the ADs want to see some action
on the WG mailing list and contributions that get serious
and evaluation. The proposal to have docs submitted by Sep 15
to see serious WG interest in the form of technical discussions
a pre-req in order to even consider continuation and/or
the charter of this WG.
this helps to clarify the AD position.