[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


well, let us look at the following string (say for sysDescr): "my system".

1) ASCII: 9 bytes
2) BER:   4+4+18 = 34 bytes.

So I would say ASCII is 400 % more efficient. am i right ?


-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:03 PM
To: sgoswami@umich.edu
Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: 

>>>>> Subrata Goswami writes:

Subrata> thanks juergen. do you have any number comparing the
Subrata> efficiencies of ASCII and BER encoding ?

It is an exercise... ;-)