[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: EOS WG Minutes - Minneapolis
- To: email@example.com, Lauren Heintz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: EOS WG Minutes - Minneapolis
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:37:53 +0200
- Delivery-date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:44:45 -0800
- Envelope-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
A few small comments
> From: Lauren Heintz[SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 4:59 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: EOS WG Minutes - Minneapolis
... snip ... a big piece ...
> Bert again echoed the mantra that it is OK to consider such things for
> the future, but probably not until EOS completes initial charter. We
> may have charter enhanced with things later on that fall off SMING
> charter. SNMPv3 WG considering whether we need to extend more
> security models, but such issues are not part of EOS WG either.
I'd change the last sentence into
SNMPv3 WG has been considering whether we need to extend
> more security models, but such issues are not part of SNMPv3 WG and
not part of EOS WG either.
... snip ...
> Bert encouraged the editors to sign-on to the April 20th milestone,
> and no objections were heard.
The question ws asked what needed to go into the drafts. I.e. we do not
want a lot of TBD sections. And I agreed. What I encouraged the editors to
do is to take the lead and extract (with force if needed) the ideas from the
various people and try to work those into the documents.